My TGIF’s lazy morning was challenged by Fareed Zakaria’s article about liberalism that invites the revolution to move to the center. It got me thinking. Here are some of my nomadic thoughts.
In Adrian Wooldridge’s new book, “The Revolutionary Center,” a brilliant intellectual history of liberalism from the Enlightenment to the present, Wooldridge reminds us that liberalism was once the most radical force in politics. It attacked inherited privilege, monopoly power, censorship, aristocracy, clerical authority, and closed guilds. It was not the ideology of the establishment. It was the battering ram against the establishment
Socialist democrats, a political gadfly, are putting an emphatic stamp on the Democratic Party. Its ascendancy is under scrutiny and anxiety-provoking among most centrists and moderates.
The philosophical core of classical liberalism since the Enlightenment has encompassed individual liberty, limited government, private property, religious tolerance, social pluralism, accountability, free markets, reason, progress, and the rule of law.
Since the 1990s, the laissez-faire approach and the erosion of the essence of liberalism as originally conceived have manifested in corporate consolidations, legacy admissions, meritocratic “aristocracy”, homelessness, obesity, and NIMBYism, among other salient symptoms.
The failure is most glaring at the K-12 level, where union, political, school board, and foundation interests prevail at the expense of the next generation.
The Centrist approach to address this problem, perhaps harshly labeled Paternal Liberalism, is an attempt at reform that seeks to elevate the little guy to a level playing field and connect it with accountability.
The Leftist approach seeks transformation and not reform. The left seeks a system-based redistribution, identity-based politics, and outcome-based liberalism, if it can still use the liberalism label.
At present, the discourse is animated, loud, and contentious. Hopefully, it remains civil. Stay tuned.
– brij




